Friday, 30 November 2007

Chickening Out

The attempt to discredit organic production and deny poultry breeders the right to vaccinate against bird flu may have deeper implications.
In America, a website called The Center for Global Food Issues, a project of the conservative think-tank the Hudson Institute, unashamedly promotes biotech in agriculture and tries hard to debunk organic production. "When will the world realize that Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund are trying to roll back modern civilization ...?" it asks.
Now it is saying:
"Let's give up on that "free-range" label and keep ourselves and birds protected from the avian flu. Keep them indoors."
Warmwell has already received a worried email from a reader in America asking about the validity of such CGFI claims as
".. indoor birds are more comfortable than their free-range cousins because they're protected from hot sun and fierce winter. ...indoor birds are unlikely to get or spread the flu to each other, or to us".
It will be remembered that the government's chief scientist and biotech advocate, Sir David King, has always led the charge to blame wild birds for H5N1. From the start of the bird flu scare at Holton in February he blamed wild birds as the source of the infection. Last year he declared that bird flu could mean the end of free-range and organic chicken and turkey farming (link).

As Magnus Linklater wrote,
"What is disturbing about so many of the statements coming out of Defra about the need to bring free-range flocks indoors, to end organic farming, to "monitor" but never to introduce vaccination - is that they are made by people with little first-hand knowledge of the one science they should be on top of: virology."
In April 2006 an email from two virologists warning that the UK still had insufficient or no H5N1 influenza vaccine stocks, pointed out that it is essential to have clinical virologists working alongside veterinarians, advising the UK government. They made it clear, back in April 2006, that "the failure to prepare reflects a lack of understanding of viral disease in DEFRA and government and has implications for human disease risk."

Now we see that, following the preliminary epidemiologic report into the Norfolk H5N1 outbreak, both wild birds and organic farming are again back in the firing line. Although all 31 references to wild birds in the report make clear that H5N1 infection has not been detected "nor have any incidents of high mortality been observed in the area" the epidemiological report says the Norfolk strain had a 99.8% identity to the isolates from "wild birds" in June and July 2007 in the Czech Republic. However, in an email today, Alan Beat of, quotes the FAO report which says that the Czech outbreak
"started on a commercial turkey farm on 21st June holding 1800 birds. On 10th July, a single infected dead wild mute swan was found some distance away."
Although the epidemiological report mentions the single mute swan it does not mention the conclusion of the FAO investigation that the source was more likely to have been the turkey farms - i.e. not to the farms via birds but the other way round:
"the disease has spilled over from the turkey farms in the Czech Republic resulting in wild bird infections."
Yet Fred Landeg told journalists: "At the present time wild birds, most likely migratory species from central Europe, cannot be ruled out as the source of infection" The BBC's first obedient headline? "Flu cases 'linked to wild birds". It is both interesting and reassuring that this has now changed to "Bird flu cause probe inconclusive"
Even more heartening is the campaign by Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall to put pressure on the poultry industry to raise its standards. Chicken Out! is being led by River Cottage locals, especially in and around Axminster, who are boycotting intensively-reared chickens and choosing free range instead. This is a splendid initiative and people are signing up all the time.


Kitchen Garden said...

Great, and Timely post.

The CGFI and the Hudson Institute have ties to Stamford University and a great many other "pro-biotec" industries and organizations. They are also behind a "consumer awareness" group and the blog "Milk is Milk" (which doesn't deserve a link or any more traffic than they already get) which sets about to defame and destroy the organic and raw milk movements. The idea behind it is deceptively simple--hey, milk is milk--why do we need all these distinctions. r-Bst is fine, cows make hormones anyway. . . .Plain evil. Monsanto, no surprise, is a huge funder of the Hudson Institute and they have ties to Cornell and Penn State's Veterinary departments which help spread their lies to students.

The "Move the Free Range birds inside" schemes are more of the same Big Ag pressuring the little guy or gal. In the States the new tactic is to use the outbreaks of foodborne illness--all caused by Industrial Farming and Big Ag--to create stiff new legislation which drives out small farms, but leaves the big-boys to "police themselves."
Consumers need to wake up before it's too late. Before Big-Ag and it's bitch--Government--steal our right to choose what we eat.
Consumers need to wake up to the fact that Government and it's corporate overseers are the reasons behind 99% of the livestock disease outbreaks. DEFRA, the USDA--twins from the same putrid womb, the sucklings of Corporate Agriculture and Government Greed. The both make it seem like without them farmers would just let their livestock suffer, disease run rampant and people would starve or die from eating excrement soaked foods. Ha! That's what' happening now. What the US & UK need are Farmer run departments of Ag. Departments which Consumers control via the marketplace.

Save the planet. Buy Local. Eat a Cow to save the Countryside. No small Farms=no safe food.

Roger Thomas said...

One of my views on the piffle reported on Bird Flu from Feb 2007.

this and others started going round the net. one national paper may have quoted from them. Using the term "some experts already believe...". rather than Roger at applied planetary engineering.